Showing posts with label Microsoft. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Microsoft. Show all posts

Thursday, 19 November 2015

XBOX as PLC - Is it Feasible?

On November 9. 2015 Frank Schliephacke, a Senior Engineer at Westinghouse Electric Company on LinkedIn Groups, posted the following question. He wrote:
Given the evolving Industry 4.0 and IoT the XBOX is the ideal hardware: Single type, off the shelf, cheap, long live cycle. Thus what problems do you see? 
For the actual thread I refer to, see https://www.linkedin.com/grp/post/68581-6069194159758016514

To delve into this question a bit deeper, some definitions may be in order...

What is Industry 4.0?

As manufacturers look to the future, they are examining how advanced information and communication technologies can boost value creation. In Germany, this development is called "Industry 4.0." Similar initiatives have been launched in other European countries, the U.S., China, and elsewhere. Industry 4.0 aims to achieve production-related advantages by creating a networked, flexible, and dynamically self-organizing manufacturing process for highly customizable products.

Over the next 15 to 20 years, it is expected to be accompanied by a paradigm shift that could justifiably be called the fourth industrial revolution. The result will appear to be revolutionary from today’s point of view, but ultimately it will involve a large number of development steps in a process of evolution.

 The first industrial revolution was triggered by the invention of the steam engine and the mechanization of manual work in the 18th century. The second revolution was made possible by the introduction of electricity and involved the use of mass production techniques in the early 20th century, and the third was ushered in during the past few decades by electronic systems and computer technologies for automating manufacturing and finishing processes. Now the rules are changing again in many sectors, due to the digitization of the entire value chain and continuous and pervasive access to a comprehensive range of information in the form of virtual models, data, and knowledge.


(Source Siemens - see http://www.siemens.com/innovation/en/home/pictures-of-the-future/industry-and-automation/digtial-factory-trends-industry-4-0.html) The world of Industry 4.0 is built upon a new area called Cyber-Physical Systems I might add which has sensors, connectivity and local decision making at its core - perfect for the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT).

What is the Internet of Things (IoT)?

To quote Greg Goodwin from LNS Research who defines Internet of Things as:

The IoT refers to the network or networks encompassing the use of standard Internet Protocol (IP) technologies to connect people, processes, and things to enable new cyber-physical systems. The Industrial IoT should be understood as a subset of the broader IoT, where these connections exist mainly to produce physical goods for the marketplace as well as to maintain the physical assets of production.

Whereas previously, the Internet has generally been understood as comprising a network of computers, the adoption of mobile, embedded sensors, and other technologies is expanding this definition to include people and objects outfitted or embedded with smart sensors. As this trend grows over time with improved technology and less expensive hardware, the number of connected “objects” will trend toward all-encompassing. By 2020, this network is expected to include:
  • Devices
  • Sensors
  • Instrumentation
  • Materials
  • Mobile and Fixed Assets
  • Products
  • People
Today the majority of manufacturing companies have a legacy of information and automation technology solutions that have been implemented over several decades, with most of these solutions built on a mix of open and proprietary communication protocols that were the industry standard at the time of their development. As these systems do not easily inter-operate with one another, this communication sticking point is a major roadblock to actually realizing Industrial IoT capabilities, and why the creation of an IIoT Platform that can integrate the information from these legacy systems is necessary.

The IIoT Platform is a future looking framework for categorizing the technology capabilities that are necessary to deliver Smart Connected Operations, Smart Connected Assets, and the Smart Connected Enterprise. A growing area of market activity, the progress and development in constructing the IIoT Platform is something we’ll be talking and blogging about frequently as time moves on.

For manufacturers to capture the true value of the IIoT LNS Research sees four main buckets of capabilities that are critical in enabling the Industrial Internet of Things platform:
  • Connectivity: This includes all necessary hardware and software to network within the plant and the enterprise, standards for integrating machines, clouds, applications and the technology for quickly and efficiently managing devices, moving data, and triggering events.
  • Cloud: Includes all of the various clouds across an enterprise to implement computing and storage capabilities wherever they are most needed—at the edge, within the plant, at the enterprise, or outside the firewall
  • Big Data Analytics: Includes the use of a broad set of statistical and optimization tools to cleanse, monitor, and analyze both structured and unstructured data for enabling unprecedented insights
  • Application Development: Includes the needed tools for quickly and easily creating new mashup software applications that leverage all other areas of the IIoT platform as well as quickly and easily moving existing legacy applications on top of the platform as well.
See: http://blog.lnsresearch.com/what-is-the-industrial-internet-of-things-iiot-platform    

Points to Ponder:

Martin Schlinder in his 02.25.2015 iBadge Infineon Article quotes market research firm Gartner in 2015 should be in the retail segment 2.9 billion networked objects in use. By 2020, the number of networked devices is expected to increase to over 13 billion.

In Summary:

As the price of hardware drops, the level of inter-connectedness rises, the need for mass customization, the tolerance for waste is zero and level of velocity on the factory floor increases, I can see that mass produced gaming boxes like XBOX will have a place over time on the factory floor, the Smart City, Home Automation and IIoT world in general.

In the responses that Frank got to his original question, some pointed out that PLCs need to be robust, documented, stable, available for the long haul and pass certain certifications - all good points. But the old world of PLCs is daily being bombarded by low cost suppliers like Automation Direct and now Arduino and Rasberry Pi - so the writing is on the wall that it will come... 

My posted answer today to Frank's XBOX as a PLC question was as such...

Use of COTS hardware is a driving force these days on the factory floor. Most PLCs do not do mission critical systems, and even in the PLC world there are special categories of PLCs just for safety and harsh environments.
The real question here is with the advanced math/graphics processing, the economies of scale in production, the native networking and the backing of Microsoft (yes, I have asked them personally not 6 months ago) - the use of XBOX and other Microsoft products on the factory floor is something to be considered.
For my part Frank, I think it should be... Microsoft has long been interested in the factory floor even supporting the OMAC (Organization for Machine Automation & Control see http://www.omac.org) group of which I was a part in the Global HMI Sub-Committee. Today the fruits of that original OMAC XML schema have become MTConnect (see www.mtconnect.org). 
Use of open source hardware will come, as will leveraging advancing in gaming technology on the factory floor I predict. Look at the Digital Manufacturing and Design Innovation Institute (http://dmdii.uilabs.org/) in Chicago that my friend Dr. Dean Bartles is running for where all this is going... exciting times!
One final thought ... my friend Richard (Dick) Morley (the inventor of the PLC) once challenged me to make manufacturing into a game somehow - today I call this "gamification" and we are seriously doing research to make that reality...

In the end, I bet the XBOX and its gaming brethren could help the manufacturing process more than you know ...

Friday, 5 October 2012

Microsoft's Long Standing Interest in Manufacturing


I came across today this entry that I had made to Tyler Bryson's Blog, who was at the time the point person for Microsoft's Manufacturing Strategy. Although it is old (Aug 30, 2010), it is interesting to see how long Microsoft has been involved in this space. My comments were designed to welcome him (and the Microsoft Blog) into this manufacturing space, and let him know that we have enjoyed Microsoft's long standing interest in our sector. 

If I could talk to him today, I would ask about Microsoft's "Green Project" as it applied to manufacturing. I was told this summer at the Microsoft World Partner Conference in Toronto that the initiative was stalled when Steve Ballmer took over Microsoft and I wonder why. The "Green" initiative was to help manufacturing and I think we should open this up again...

Check Out Microsoft's "Manufacturing Matters" Blog at:

http://blogs.msdn.com/b/manufacturing/

Also of interest was Tyler's first blog posting way back in 2008:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/manufacturing/archive/2008/07/28/manufacturing-matters-to-microsoft.aspx


By the way, the current US Manufacturing & Resources General Manager for Microsoft is now Craig Hodges and he is continuing to highlight "innovations and ideas from across Microsoft in Manufacturing" in the Blog.

-------------------------------------------------- 

Tyler - I know that this is an old Blog - but I just wanted to welcome you to the manufacturing space.

Microsoft has actually been interested in and sponsoring events in our space for years. When I was with the Global HMI Sub-Committee in OMAC (Open Modular Architecture Controls group), Microsoft had a MUG (Microsoft User Group). We are talking over 10 years ago, before OMAC joined ISA and when it was under the ARC people's direction. Back then, I was running an upstart company after I had coined a new name that quickly became a category, namely "e-Manufacturing". After writing the first widely accepted XML Schema with Dr. Stephen Lane-Smith, I was happy that it has been used in the last few years and added to by MTConnect (see MTConnect.org) with sponsorship from the American Machine Tool Association. I now am involved with MTConnect on their Technical Advisory Board.

Our dream of barrier-free connectivity is now coming to pass and Microsoft will be a player in this. Our software systems over the years have relied heavily on Microsoft products - at times this was trying, but at least a standard could be leveraged for all. Today our goal is to connect the millions of isolated machine tools and provide a cloud of "machine2machine" inter-connectivity and synergy. We look at the plant as one machine now, and are in some ways living up to the 1998 press in Modern Machine Shop we got under the Memex name as the suppliers of the "shop floor nervous system".

I want to leave you with a thought - back in the DotCom days (yes, we were one of them - TSX:MFG) I explained to the VCs that wondered about this connectivity thing, that what we were talking about was the equivalent of clicking buy on the Net and the machine would almost instantly start making the product you needed. We are talking of a "Zero waste - made to order - ultra high velocity of data flow - integrated - quick response - perfect orders" - type of thing and all JIT! We want to leverage IT on the factory floor and with my new team of over a dozen companies, and with the technology we have today, I do not see why we cannot have this "click-buy-make-ship" dream.

Sunday, 24 July 2011

Microsoft's Interest in CIM

Microsoft has actually been interested in, and has been sponsoring events in the Computer Integrated Manufacturing space for years.

When I was with the Global HMI Sub-Committee in OMAC (Open Modular Architecture Controls group), Microsoft had a MUG (Microsoft User Group). We are talking over 10 years ago, before OMAC joined ISA and when it was under the ARC people's direction. Back then, I was running an upstart company after I had coined a new name that quickly became a category, namely "e-Manufacturing". After writing the first widely accepted XML Schema with Dr. Stephen Lane-Smith, I was happy that it has been used in the last few years and added to by MTConnect (see MTConnect.org) with sponsorship from the American Machine Tool Association. I now am involved with MTConnect on their Technical Advisory Board.

Our dream of barrier-free connectivity is now coming to pass and Microsoft will be a player in this. Our software systems over the years have relied heavily on Microsoft products - at times this was trying, but at least a standard could be leveraged for all. Today our goal is to connect the millions of isolated machine tools and provide a cloud of "machine2machine" inter-connectivity and synergy. We look at the plant as one machine now, and are in some ways living up to the 1998 press in Modern Machine Shop we got under the Memex name as the suppliers of the "shop floor nervous system".

I want to leave with a thought - back in the DotCom days (yes we were one of them) I explained to people that wondered about this connectivity thing that what we were talking about was the equivalent of clicking buy on the Net and the machine would almost instantly start making the product you needed. Zero waste - made to order - ultra velocity of data flow and yet in your hands quickly. We want to leverage IT on the factory floor and with my team of over a dozen companies and with technology we have today, I do not see why we cannot have this "click-buy-make-ship" dream.